Instructions: Read each syllogism below and explain why it is either valid or invalid. (As ever, you will assume the soundness of each premise, but not necessarily the validity of each conclusion.). Note: You do NOT need to identify the type of syllogism. Also, validity questions are worth 3 points, and “why” questions are worth 2 points.

1. Premise A: If the visitor was a stranger, then the dog would have barked.
Premise B: The dog barked.
Conclusion: The visitor was a stranger.

Valid/Invalid?

Why?

what can best be inferred from this excerpt is the pittsburgh pirates had a winning season in 1972., the specific information about the year is provided in the excerpt.

the other options are not correct because we can not assure that roberto clemente was the best since we don't know the information about the other players, there are no mentions about any specific fan either and it is clear that not many batters can make it to   3000 hits because it is mention as a high number.

although there are different versions for the fairy tale little red riding hood,   as the one from grimm brothers and perrault, all of the versions show the huntsman as a man who is in perfect harmony with nature. the statement that best describe him, the huntsman, is that he is a true hero who inspires those around him due to his words and actions. the way he acts show internal reflections that are an example to follow by anybody who takes the time to analysing them. he shows altruism actions when he aside puts his job just to check the grandmother is well, by doing this he could notice at an early stage what has happened and could save her.