Which statement best expresses the different conclusions the speaker
of the poems draws about the stars in these two poems?
A)
The first poem mocks the stars having any
Significance, while the second poem praises stars as
Superior to mankind
Neither poem differs from the other significantly in
the conclusions each draws about the stars and their
significance
The first poem sees the stars as superior to man's
knowledge, while the second sees the stars as
inferior to man's soul
The first poem laments the loss of stars to the clouds,
while the second rejoices in what science teaches us
in astronomy

the father traits is what becomes more dominate the mothers is half dominate or vise versa depending on the gender.

i think the answer is c. there are many strengths

i hope this and if its correct mark me brainliest

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

the answer to this question is unstoppable.