Can someone paraphrase my answer without losing the meaning of it too much and keeping the same tone. Thank you!

My answer changes if a large Brazilian company buys up all the groves in Central Florida creating a monopsony power for this company because the grove owner can hire more workers since the workers will be paid less than their marginal revenue product which generate more profit for the business and increase the marginal product labor. Since a monopsony power results in less pay for a competitive labor pool, the grove owner can hire more workers than 3 because of the decrease in all the factors affecting profit. The number of workers hired and the worker’s wages would compare to a perfectly competitive labor market in aspects of salary, where a person in a perfectly competitive market would not earn higher than the market clearing wage rate since both sides of the market are equally competitive whereas a person in this situation would still be able to earn more than the marginal clearing wage rate, just not as much as their marginal revenue product. The number of workers in a perfectly competitive market would be less than the number of workers in a monopsony market, because more workers would be hired for more profit while less workers will be hired in a perfectly competitive market because of the large number of people who are of the same profession but there is a greater number of companies to work at whereas a monopsony only has one large company that dominates the market.

a

explanation:

she might be shy, amzed or in love.

explanation:

mark brainliest, , and rate

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).