PLEASE HELP ASAP DUE TONIGHT

"Written Response (Project): Group Discussion" this is what you will need to do. You will think of a topic of your choice in which you could do research on. Some examples could be child abuse, women's rights, and opioid. From this you will do research and get a good idea of your topic. Now, you would image you did this as a group project. Meaning you worked on this topic with a group. You will then reflect on your experiences planning, speaking, and listening through a written evaluation. What this means is that you will write a summary of your experience on planning the group discussion, how did you speak with your fellow peers, how was your listening skills within the discussion. Once you did all of that you will need to do a summary of 3-4 paragraphs response to questions on step 5 in your study guide. Make sure you checked everything in the checklist. If you did not check out everything then go back and make sure you do it.

step 5--

 What did you do to prepare in advance for the discussion? How well prepared were you?

 What rules were created for the discussion? Were they followed?

 How well did you present your viewpoint?

 How did your own background knowledge, experience, values, or beliefs affect the way

you presented your views? Explain.

 How successful were you at listening and responding to other group members?

 How did you use evidence to explain and defend your views, including when someone

disagreed with you?

 In what ways did other participants use reasoning and evidence to make their points?

 Were there any times when someone didn’t use evidence or the evidence didn’t match

the viewpoint presented? Did a participant exaggerate or distort information? Explain.

 Was there a time when someone’s viewpoint differed from your own? What might have

influenced his or her opposing viewpoint? Explain.

 How was your language grammatically correct and appropriate to the topic, purpose,

and audience? Give an example.

 What kinds of hand gestures and facial expressions did you and other people use to

match what was being said?

 How did you use eye contact, the volume of your voice, or other means to connect with

others during the discussion?

 How well did the group solve problems and come to consensus?

 Overall, how effective was the group discussion?

I Created prepared by making a plan and found a focus. I would say I was prepared but not to the best of my ability.

The rules that were created for the discussion were that you can't interrupt when someone else is talking and that when someone else is up to talk don't be loud. The rules were followed well.

I think I did a very good job of presenting my viewpoint.

I didn't really use anything from my personal past during this discussion, I only used information needed for it.

I listened to my group members and answered the questions they asked during the discussion.

I defended my claims against others by proving my points using evidence.

They used facts and evidence to support their claims and points.

I would say there wasn’t a time when evidence wasn’t used. All group members were heavily encouraged to use evidence and they did.

Yes there were times when the whole group didn’t agree on the same thing. It was only minor things and it was only natural for our opinions to differ.  

My tone was appropriate for this discussion because I used a business or professional tone.

No purposeful gestures or expressions were used, only pointing.  

I used eye contact throughout the discussion just to look at the others. I wasn’t quiet when talking but I wasn’t loud either. I talked just loud enough for my voice to be heard by everyone.

The group solved problems well and effectively.

The group was effective.

Explanation:

just simple answers to each question, not specific to any certain discussion.

glamis thou art, and cawdor; and shalt be what thou art promis'd; yet do i fear thy nature; it is too full o' the milk of human kindness to catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great; art not without ambition; but without the illness should attend it. what thou wouldst highly, that wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false, and yet wouldst wrongly win: thou'dst have, great glamis, that which cries, "thus thou must do, if thou have it: and that which rather thou dost fear to do than wishest should be undone." hie thee hither, that i may pour my spirits in thine ear; and chastise with the valor of my tongue all that impedes thee from the golden round, which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem to have thee crown'd withal.  

he lacks ambition.  

he is hesitant.  

he lacks courage.  

he has moral scruples.

answer; (external conflict)