subject
English, 18.02.2020 17:51 sciencegeekgirl2017

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which statement contains an opinion? the ants serve to protect the acacia from other plants and herbivores. the acacia depends on pollinators for the exchange of genetic material. the acacia has no chemical defenses to discourage herbivores. the ants provide the acacia with the best protection from other plants and herbivores.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
Which two pieces of evidence support the idea that coal is underutilized? this was on study island about coal
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
Match the sentence to its correct verb mood
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
What is the most reliable method of research in lexicographery
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hy...
Questions