Take one of the oppositions that postman describes in the paragraph quoted above. in your brave new world notebook, write down the sentence or sentences that describes this opposition. then think about connections with our own world. what is your gut feeling about it? is orwell’s vision or huxley’s vision more accurate? what kind of evidence would you need to convince someone one way or the other? how would you investigate it?

try to do soaps tone.

s-subject

o-occasion (the reason the author wrote the poem)

a-audience (who is this poem mostly for)

p-purpose (was it to convince, inspire, etc. the audience)

s-speaker (can be the author or another character, like is a child, adult, woman, elderly, animal narrating the poem)

tone- the mood the reader gets from this poem

mood- the mood the author had with their own poem

meaning- what do you think the meaning is?

message- what is the author trying to explain to the audience? like what is the theme?

if you still don't get it try showing everyone the poem so they could unravel it

the purpose of the heading in the passage is to identify who is telling the story.

this excerpt is part of the book sugar changed the world (2010) written by marc aronson and marina budhos. as the book has been written by two people, the heading "marc" indicates that this specific excerpt is being narrated by aronson. in the fragment, marc describes his grandfather's story after hearing it from his cousin. however, there are other excerpts where budhos is the one that tells the story of her family.

aronson and budhos, who are husband and wife in real life, decided to write sugar changed the world when they found out how sugar, which had an important role in slavery and economy, changed their ancestors' lives.

what is your question because all i see is "i'll give 25p. and give brainliest.

the answer is a)   a sentence of death costs the state "almost three times as much as a sentence of life in prison" (delon 147)