The writer of the point, "the value of teaching history through fiction," and the writer of the counterpoint, "the dangers of fictionalizing history," share their views of using fiction to teach history. how did the ideas differ? cite textual details to summarize the main points that each essay writer makes

The two writers' ideas differ regarding the effects that teaching the story through fiction can generate.

We can arrive at this answer as follows:

In this case, we can say that the relationship between history and fiction is something that must be debated and evaluated, to be used or discarded.

More information:

link

Fiction is used to teach History because it increases the curiosity of the kids and also presents multiple perspectives. But the disadvantages of using fiction to teach History are it might lead to inaccuracy, biasedness and incompetence.

Explanation:

Using Fiction for teaching History can help the children to understand History and build up curiosity. It can help them experience a complex truth and put them back into History and past times. It presents the complexity of the issues and promotes multiple perspectives.

But it can be dangerous to fictionalize History because it can lead to inaccuracy, biasedness and incompetence. This can also lead to the destruction of the civilization of that time and the personality trashing because of fictionalizing History.

to avoid unnecessary repetition, not every chapter has a map exercise attached. write a one or two-sentence answer explaining the significance of the items 7, ¶ 3-4 - civilization began in the fertile crescent because villages needed careful “in an epic tale told not long after his reign, we find gilgamesh claiming

the narrator is saying that the old lady made her feel uncomfortable. you know this because they say "i found that rather irksome", "perhaps it was her being so upright and trim", and "i don't think it was that, because i thought that quaintly pleasant." hope this !