What could the author add to support his argument in the last sentence of paragraph 2? a) take out the claim that reality shows are extremely popular. b) take out his description of all he did to get on the reality show c) add an example of an unhappy event occurring on a show, just as it would in real life d) add a sentence describing his father’s reaction to his future reality show experience.

Add an example of an unhappy event occurring on a show, just as it would in real life.

Option C.

Explanation:

In the last sentence of the second paragraph, the author could have added an example that showed an unhappy event which occurs on the show as a support of his argument.

The reason for this is that he needed to show his mother that every thing that happens does not have a happy ending all the time. Things in real life are much more difficult and do not have happy endings all the time. This will give a specific and concrete examples of what happens in the reality shows and they do not show very pleasant things.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

being buried alive

explanation: