Is the first person narrator trustworthy as he gives his account of the events in the tell tale heart

answer:

i don't think so, because:

our narrator is such a wreck, it's hard not to feel sorry for him. he's nervous ("very dreadfully nervous"), paranoid, and physically and mentally ill. he doesn't know the difference between the "real" and the "unreal," and seems to be completely alone and friendless in the world. we suspect that he rarely sleeps.

oh yeah: and he's also a murderer.

maybe this explains why he doesn't share his name, or any other identifying characteristics. he wants us to know what he did, but not where to find him. we actually have precious little to go on in discussing his character, and we have to do lots of investigation and reading between the lines to come up with possibilities.

before we explore some of those possibilities, we should clear up a fine point. poe doesn't explicitly tell us if the narrator is male or female. the only reason we feel comfortable calling the narrator "he" is these lines: "you fancy me mad. madmen know nothing" (3) (our italics). this isn't one hundred percent proof that the narrator is male, so it's important to consider the possibility that the narrator is , for now, we are clinging to those lines to get out of having to use the awkward "he/she."

the answer is: round.

in literature, round characters are considerably complex and experience or are subjected to unpleasant situations. as a consequence, they go through crucial sentimental and psychological development, which can cause surprise in the readers. in this case, juan's dramatic transformation is related to the adversities he meets at school.

the aesthetic impact is that moment when you are relating spatially to the target. the "ai" occurs when you have an impression that includes both you and the target and is usually a spatial relationship.