Which detail is relevant for an argument to make drivers who run through red lights pay a fee?
o even though everyone knows that going through red lights is illegal, they do it anyway.
o the current fines, which are being used to maintain roads, are generating a lot of money for the city.
o people do not feel safe on the street because they know drivers are not stopping at red lights.
o the current fines are not high enough to discourage drivers from going through red lights.

In my opinion, the second one – the current fines, which are being used to maintain roads, is generating a lot of money from the city, which is the correct one.

Explanation :

Nothing can convince anyone to pay money unless it is in some way beneficial to the one who is paying it. That he is paying it as a punishment makes it a compulsion that he cannot evade.

The first option is a casual remark taking things for granted.

The third one is a reminder of a serious situation but it will have no effect on drivers as very few understand the responsibility.

The fourth one talks about raising the fee.

Only the second option stating that the fines will be used to maintain roads well will ensure that drivers not complying with the rules pay the fee. It will be a future benefit for all including them.

The correct answer is D

Got it right on edg2020

Explanation:

Can i get brainlist?

idk you tell me

explanation: