Why would the following likely fail as the basis for an interpretive argument about "humpty dumpty? "
"at the end of the rhyme, humpty dumpty is broken."

The task of the interpretive argument is to come up with a plausible and well-crafted research question, and developing a case for seeing a text in a particular way using relevant evidence and valid reasoning. ... When you put together an interpretive argument, you're trying on a well-crafted idea to see how it fits.

Explanation:

As the answer says, The task of an interpretive arguement is to come up with a plausible reasearch question.

hello, never fear the humanspider is here!

answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.

it's likely the answer would be c.

- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.

- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.

- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.

**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**

note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!

~

your friendly neighborhood human spider.

why? ? and you will probably get ban

explanation:

yes a mod can probably ban you, and will if you continue to spam. i don't know why you would want to be ban.