(1) may 18, 2010, marked 30 years since the eruption of mt. st. helens in washington state. (2) the volcano had been assumed to be rather dormant, so the magnitude of the event was surprising, even to volcanologists. (3) predicting an eruption is quite challenging, but there are a number of warning signs. (4) if a volcano is getting close to erupting, the gases it emits will change, as will its pattern of earthquakes. (5) volcanoes may even begin to change their shape as material is moving within them. (6) this happened with mt. st. helens, as it began to bulge visibly from one side.
(7) scientists have a hard time forecasting exactly when a volcano will erupt. (8) often, eruptions aren't accurately predicted because scientists don't have the measurements they need. (9) however, in mexico in 1993, a high level of sulfur dioxide—one of the volcanic gases—was detected around a volcano near mexico city. (10) warnings were issued to the mexican government that an eruption may be looming. (11) it wasn't until many months later that the volcano finally did erupt. (12) scientists say what they most need in order to more successfully predict eruptions is simply more eruptions! (13) that would allow them to test their theories on the real thing.
which of these sentences least supports the main idea of this passage?
a.
the volcano had been assumed to be rather dormant, so the magnitude of the event was surprising, even to volcanologists.
b.
warnings were issued to the mexican government that an eruption may be looming.
c.
it wasn't until many months later that the volcano finally did erupt.
d.
scientists say what they most need in order to more successfully forecast eruptions is simply more eruptions!

if this isnt a true or false than they have equal amount of importants

what is   the question

the anecdote makes readers feel sorry for the man’s lack of heritage, then reminds readers that the man has an equally valuable heritage.

the play romeo and juliet was one of the most famous love tragedies ever written. this love story unfortunately had a fatal ending. many people argue over why the lovers had died, was it over free will or fate?  

the death of romeo and juliet was partially because of free will. the fact that romeo and juliet got married knowing that there was a bitter feud between their families, the montague and capulet’s. this feud brought on many problems, such as the murder of tybalt by romeo. juliet knew that this might be a problem for her and romeo. juliet had said: “what’s in a name”? which explains her ill fate of being a capulet and romeo being a montague. when romeo tells his servant “ ay, mine own…show more content…

i believe they had died over the love they had for each other, strong enough that their lives could end so suddenly if something horrible had come between them, and that was exactly how it happened. this tragedy occurred within five days of the two meeting, they experienced love at first sight, got married and quickly were dead. free will became a part of this when juliet decided to take friar laurence’s advise in inhaling a potion that will make people assume she is died but will awake in 42 hours prier to when she took it. when romeo had heard the news that juliet was dead, he assumed it was true, and responded with the line; “well juliet, i will lay with thee tonight”. to me this line indicated how he feels for juliet by dying in her will. the fact that free will didn’t take control of the story; it left fate to be the murder of the lovers. fate first kicked in when their eyes met at the capulet party. when romeo and juliet spoke, their words had powerful contentment; they had such a strong feeling for one another that they could lay in each other’s arms forever. their happiness didn’t last long; there were many reasons for this, for example; the marriage lord capulet arranged between paris and juliet. i believe that the plot of the play thus far leads the audience to believe that the deaths were a result of fate. the last act will determine once and for all if it is fate or free will. romeo again challenges fate.

explanation: