Can we keep our libraries? we need to talk about libraries. pleading, like
children. is that really where we are?
write an essay in which you explain how zadie smith builds an argument to
persuade her audience that public libraries are important and should remain
open. in your essay, analyze how smith uses one or more of the features
listed in the box above (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the
logic and persuasiveness of her argument. be sure that your analysis focuses
on the most relevant features of the passage.
your essay should not explain whether you agree with smith's claims,
but rather explain how smith builds an argument to persuade her
audience.

well I’m not going write your essay

Explanation:

You can state your opinion around the topic then repeatedly reinforce your opinion with evidence and a strong ending

the correct answer is "(13) “they take a term that sounds really wonderful, but genetic engineering is genetic engineering is genetic engineering,” ms. tencer said. “it is not something farmers want. it is not something consumers want. i don’t think it is a very viable concept.” by explicitly stating that farmers or consumers do not want genetic engineering to produce their food the existence of opposition towards genetically modified organisms is presented. also, it is worth mentioning that ms. tender is the executive director of the organic farming research foundation in santa cruz, ca as stated in evidence 12, which supports her statement presented in evidence 13.

he is a good writer and his works should not be questioned