Which of the following sentences best summarizes why america separated from britain?
a) americans felt that colonialism was unfair and hurting the native populations.
b) colonists had a hard time communicating with britain because of the distance between them, making it difficult for britain to respond to serious issues.
c) americans were extremely unhappy under british rule, and wanted to make sure they would never be taxed without representation again.
d) colonists wanted each colony to have more power as a state over their ability to collect taxes and raise their own armies.
part a: which two of the following identify central ideas of the text?
a. the constitution was inferior to the articles of federation, under which the states had dealt with shays’ rebellion and diplomatic trade conflicts.
b. the constitution was founded on compromises between states of different sizes and populations.
c. the constitution sought to balance the power of the three branches of government while allowing the president to have the most power to introduce laws and determine foreign relations.
d. the constitution sought to balance the power dynamic between the central government and all the state governments.
e. the founding fathers began the constitution with the bill of rights because the individual's rights were most important to them.
f. the constitution has had to be amended so many times because the founding fathers did a poor job at writing

it is about the use of non animal tested cosmetics.

its .gov

for the pts back! merry x-mas!

where are the answer choices?

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).