Which statement best shows how evidence related to historical events can support a claim?
secondary sources can include song lyrics written by people to communicate their experiences.
artifacts can summarize a large amount of information about a past time period.
primary sources can include the exact words that witnesses used to testify at a trial.
statistics can allow readers to focus on emotions rather than details about a past occurrence.

C). Primary sources can include the exact words that witnesses used to testify at a trial.

Explanation:

The authors employ several distinct evidence to substantiate their argument and establish the credibility of their claim.

As per the question, option A best displays the evidence related to historical events that could support a claim as the historical events could only be validated logically through primary sources(first-hand accounts) like artifacts, diaries, literary texts, etc. that offer authentic and bona fide information without leaving scope for contradiction.

The other options are incorrect as option B is covered under the third option(option A) and the other two propose secondary sources or statistics(based on a sample) that often have a scope for adulterated information that may affect the credibility of the author and his claim. Thus, option C is the correct answer.

should you be the one doing this journal entry? it says "your special talent or skill". are you gonna lie 'bout your talent and make us fake a talent for you?

also this is a really easy journal entry, you can just think of a skill your good at and write did you work hard to become good at this skill (ex: drawing, writing, math, playing music, etc.) or does it come naturally (like a cool trick that you can do with your body). you can do all of that in 150 words. just try and think of a talent and even if your bad at this talent just say your working hard to become good at it.

the correct answer is dilapidated.

hope this (: