Which best supports the claim that the argument in the last three sentences of paragraph one is valid?

which best supports the claim that the argument in the last three sentences of paragraph one is valid?
a) it is possible for both its premises to be true and its conclusion to be false.
b) the premise can be determined to be true and the conclusion follows that premise.
c) some support for the valid conclusion must exist to demonstrate its truth.
d) this argument is valid because it leads to its own conclusion.

a

explanation:

resents dr jekyll

explanation:

that is the answer

is there a passage to this question if so plz take a picture

hmm, sadly there is no dialogue. there is no place in the story where he is talking to anyone. it's more of just describing what he eats and where he sleeps. you have to become anne frank, give details of where you are, what other folks look like, how the environment is. have a little bit of dialogue tell of what people are specifically saying. anne frank talked about her entire household including the people, the objects, the lighting, the food they ate, and even the smell in the air. there has to be more to your diary entries, the whole story in its current state is only about peter van daan, the food, the sounds, and where he sleeps. also he seems to be writing only once a year yet more than that happened from day to day. for a friend, i can you write it out, if you want.