Which of the following is not a disadvantage of offering the sale of shares in
a company?
a. the company must disclose details about its finances.
b. the management loses some control over the operation of the
business.
c. the government has more restrictions over a publicly owned
company
d. the company can increase its capital without going into debt.
neeed nw

the answer would be D

Explanation:

I just took the test

D. The company can increase its capital without going into debt.

Explanation:

When a company offers up the sale of its shares, the following are some of what happens:

The company must provise an up-to-date record of its business tranactions; this is a disadvantage for the company because the more information one has control over, the more in power the company is. Hence, option A is a disadvantage

When there is sale of shares, a company is automatically yieling over a certain portion of its control/power to the buyer and this also is a disadvantage. Hence, option B is wrong

In the case of  publicly owned  company, the government has more restrictions such a company which increases the control the government has over the company. Hence, option C is also a disadvantage

When a company offers up its shares for sale, although the company cedes a certain portion of its company to the buyer, the company stands to receive financial rejuvenation/boost without going into debt or declaring bankruptcy. Hence, option A is an advantage

i agree so i wont repert this question

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people