This term describes a narrator or writer who puts her or her own opinions and feelings into the description of the action in pieces of writing. it is the opposite of objective

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

it u understand what he thought at the time and let u know more about him then what third person would of known probably. hope this : )

i wonder if it is possible to place reagans testimony and paragragh 18, so we can compare and contract the ideas in the text.