Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it:
o
a. begins with a big idea that is supported with specifics.
o
b. counts on the emotions of the audience to come to a decision
o
c. comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observatio
o
d. includes support from unreliable experts to make a point.

the answer is most likely c. it shows us that the rules that the pigs make can change on a whim whenever it suits the pigs purpose.

hope this

i wonder if it is possible to place reagans testimony and paragragh 18, so we can compare and contract the ideas in the text.

very good choice i love it hope i made your day better my love