Part a: how does the narrator’s discussion of laurie contribute to the plot of the story?

a
the narrator shows how laurie is a good kid deep down, suggesting that charles might be similarly good.
b
the narrator describes how easily influenced laurie is, suggesting that he’s not confident in his identity yet.
c
the narrator shows how naturally curious laurie is, bringing attention to why he might experiment with good and bad behaviors.
d
the narrator describes how laurie often misbehaves at home, highlighting the similarities between him and charles.

its on common lit called charles
by shirley jackson

1. at the conclusion of chapter 13, the monster realizes that he has none of the qualities or possessions that human beings value, and so he worries the he will be forever miserable. he says, “oh, that i had for ever remained in my native wood, nor known nor felt beyond the sensations of hunger, thirst, and heat! ” this statement recalls one made by victor frankenstein in chapter 10: “if our impulses were confined to hunger, thirst, and desire, we might nearly be free; but now we are moved by every wind that blows, and a chance word or scene that that word may convey to us.” questions: what do these two statements suggest about the impact of knowledge? how do the statements affect the way readers view the monster and victor?

Answer 3 and 5 for brainliest. i don’t have a link for #3 sadly.

Which event occurred in the nearly two-year time span between act 3 and act4 of the tragedy of julius caesar?