Read this excerpt from rudolfo anaya's essay "take the tortillas out of your poetry."
tortillas and poetry. they go hand in hand. books nourish the spirit, bread nourishes our bodies. our distinct
cultures nourish each one of us, and as we know more and more about the art and literature of the different cultures,
we become freer and freer.
i don't know anyone who doesn't like to sample different ethnic foods, the breads of many many groups; just as
many of us enjoy sampling books from different areas of the world. i travel to foreign countries, and i know more
about myself as i learn more about my fellow human beings. censorship imposes itself in my path of knowledge, and
that activity can be justified by no one.
which of these changes would make this excerpt more argumentative?
using words that affect the audience's sense of trust
using less repetition of certain words and phrases
including words that address logic and reason
including words that are charged with emotion

the answer is decimated

answer: more info pls

explanation:

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.