What was most likely orwell's purpose for writing this
passage?
read the passage from animal farm.
as clover looked down the hillside her eyes filled with
tears. if she could have spoken her thoughts, it would
have been to say that this was not what they had aimed
at when they had set themselves years ago to work for
the overthrow of the human race. these scenes of terror
and slaughter were not what they had looked forward to
on that night when old major first stirred them to rebellion.
if she herself had had any picture of the future, it had
been of a society of animals set free from hunger and the
whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity,
the strong protecting the weak, as she had protected the
lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of
major's speech. instead-she did not know why-they
had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind,
when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and
when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after
onfessing to shocking crimes. there was no thought of
o to show that clover is more sensitive to violence than
the others
o to remind readers of major's speech and the original
rebellion
to present napoleon as a cruel leader unworthy of the
animals' support
o to represent misled followers and their dashed hopes
for better lives

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

Which words most the reader understand the meaning of usurpers

Compound and complex sentences pre test active time remaining 19: 06 a sentence that includes an independent clause and at least one dependent clause is called a sentence.