Read this excerpt from "the world on turtle's back."when the girl awoke, she knew that she would bear twins. even before they were born, there was contention between the twins. there was no peace between these two brothers. when it was time for them to be born, the right-handed twin wanted to be born in the normal way. the left-handed twin saw light in the other direction and was determined to be born through his mother's mouth or nose. in his attempt to be born in the opposite direction, he killed his mother. based on this excerpt, it is reasonable to conclude thatthe brothers were opposites and would always be in conflict.

The answer to the statement: Based on this excerpt, it is reasonable to conclude that the brothers were opposites and would always be in conflict, would be: yes, it is possible to conclude that the brothers were opposites and would always be in conflict.

Explanation:

"The World on Turtle´s Back" is a myth from the Iroquois that narrates the events that take place at the very beginning of time: how the world was organized, who existed before man came to be, and finally, how Earth, nature, and finally, man, came to be. Along the narration of the myth, we are told that the woman from the sky, who was saved by the turtle, and other animals, and who planted the earth, bore a daughter who later became pregnant by an unknown man, and bore twin brothers. Even from the womb these two fought, to the point of killing their mother, and later each creating animals who would become enemies later on. To the very end, these two fought one another and each created something that would be the opposite of what the other created. For example, one brother created deer, and the other the mountain lion that would eat the dear. Given this, and that until the end the two continue their quarrel, it is safe to say that they are opposites and will always be in conflict.

a) the brothers were opposites and would always be in conflict.

Explanation:

i just found it on quizlet and it is correct

source text: from the sketch here given it will be seen, that our good grandmothers differed considerably in their ideas of a fine figure, from their scantily dressed descendants of the present day. a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. nor were they the less admired by the gentlemen in consequence thereof. on the contrary, the greatness of a lover's passion seemed to increase in proportion to the magnitude of its object—and a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. certain it is, that in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen - - the reason of which i conclude to be, either that the hearts of the gentlemen have grown larger, or the persons of the ladies smaller — this however is a question for physiologists to determine. add punctuation to the following excerpt. writing under the name of diedrich knickerbocker washington irving aimed his potent satire at as diverse topics as political rivals such as thomas jefferson to the very ideal of looking back on the past affectionately: a fine lady, in those times, waddled under more clothes even on a fair summer's day, than would have clad the whole bevy of a modern ball room. a voluminous damsel, arrayed in a dozen of petticoats, was declared by a low-dutch sonnetteer of the province, to be radiant as a sunflower, and luxuriant as a full blown cabbage. in those days, the heart of a lover could not contain more than one lady at a time; whereas the heart of a modern gallant has often room enough to accommodate half a dozen

the second sentence is a great revision in my opinion. that would be a great topic.

explanation: