Read the statement below then decide whether you agree or disagree with it. be prepared to support your opinion with details from the story. gregor is better off as a bug. what do you think? write a paragraph supporting your opinion and then write a reply paragraph. if you're working with others, your reply paragraph should respond to the ideas of another student. if you're working alone, your reply paragraph should support the opposite point of view from your own.

This is more or less your opinion. I cannot answer this correctly, without knowing your opinion. Sorry.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

is this a question? be more descriptive