Just read my 2 paragraphs and give feedback. all i need is proofreading.
just read and tell me how my writing is so far.
what to look for is
1. a clear introduction providing an overview of the first section of the novel.
2. paragraph two should discuss the utopian aspects with evidence from the
the setting of the novel fahrenheit 451 by ray bradbury is a utopia in which the 30-year-old firefighter, guy montag lives. montag is in a society where everything people do is fun and entertaining without any question. guy montag in being a firefighter is responsible for burning every book and also houses that contain them. however, montag notices he is not happy with the way things are with his job, his wife millie, and his surroundings. after meeting clarrise mcclellan, his neighbor, his curiosity begins to fill his mind. montag's wife doesn’t seem to care about how montag feels or what he does for her. even though montag and millie have been married for years, montag realizes, after the overdose incident, that he doesn't know much about his wife at all. montag now wants to quit his job. montag's boss captain beatty, has been suspicious with montag and comes over to his house before montag can call in sick. after captain beatty’s visit montag confesses to millie about his book stash. once millie panics, montag tries to explain to her that having these books can be beneficial. once they know what's inside the books they will destroy them together. captain beatty seemingly knows how montag is feeling and knows what he is hiding.
to start, this society may seem like a utopia at first, because everyone gets to do what they want and have fun without any consequences. guy montag's house has three walls that are tv screens. millie likes to enjoy watching her tv family for most of the day. people also ride jet cars at top speeds on the road. schools are mainly athletic activities and keeping students engaged, they have television classes. captain beatty stated "don't we keep them moving, don't we give them fun? that's all we live for, isn't it" (bradbury 56). this tells the reader that all there is to do is fun, and to enjoy life.

Voluntourism: an opportunity too good to be true a speech to the student body of evergreen high [1] picture this: it's spring break, and you fly off to some country where there's lush rainforests and beautiful, blue coastlines to explore. there's also people in need, so you decide to blend your vacation with volunteering. volunteering as a tourist, or voluntourism, seems like a great way to explore new regions and people at the same time. however, this "volunteer plus travel" experience can actually harm local communities. while many teens might view traveling and volunteering abroad as a worthwhile adventure, there are more genuine and effective ways to make a difference. [2] most would agree that volunteering in general is a worthy use of time. however, what if you found out the children you are "" are actually being kept in poor conditions so voluntourists will spend money to come to the local area? dale rolfe, a supporter of ethical voluntourism, explains the shocking reality that "animal sanctuaries and orphanages are often manufactured for the voluntourist…encouraging a cycle of exploiting the very animals and children the volunteers are trying to ." [3] proponents of the "volunteer plus travel" experience also argue that traveling to new places builds character and is a valuable way to learn about different cultures. with voluntourism, however, participants often pursue experiences that are all about them. for example, they sign up to build a school for a gold star on their resume, but they have no real building skills and take jobs away from local construction workers (schulten). or, they arrive to teach english but instead take selfies with the locals. one world traveler and ethical voluntourist believes voluntourism "can perpetuate small minded views of the world by taking insulated, fake, and structured experiences and selling them as unabridged and eye opening" (carlos). the voluntour experience is a mirage. the voluntourist's eyes are not opened to real life at the destination, and lasting change is not achieved. [4] if you want a genuine experience where you can see a lasting impact, there are better options than voluntourism. you can volunteer in your local community. give an hour every week to your town's animal rescue. serve monthly dinners to the homeless. be a reliable, positive influence on a child who needs a mentor. studies show that volunteering and forming lasting relationships with those you has a positive impact on your physical and emotional health. in fact, blood pressure is reduced, memory is improved, and rates of depression are reduced (michaels). [5] there is another reason to look into alternatives to voluntourism. did you know the average "voluntour" travel package costs $3,400 (rolfe)? could that travel money be better spent? if the world's citizens are your passion, it could go to an international organization. if you care about education, your funds can be used to buy books for students in faraway lands. if you want villagers to have clean water, contribute funds to local efforts to dig wells. if you want to experience a different culture, travel to the country as a guest, and learn from the locals how you can best them after you've returned home. but do not voluntour. [6] in reality, there are better ways to make a difference. voluntourism might appear to be an adventure that blends travel and others, but it does little except provide a costly, superficial experience that might actually do more harm than good. so, volunteer where you are most needed-at home, where you can stay to see the job through and form genuine, lasting relationships. choose a beautiful coastline closer to home and send the travel money you saved to an international organization that will put it to good use. whatever you do, don't turn someone else's hardship into your vacation. which paragraphs address the counterclaim of the argument? paragraphs 1 and 6 paragraphs 2 and 3 paragraphs 3 and 4 paragraphs 4 and 5

Plz (i only understand "the song of wandering aengus." and i have no idea what the raven means so i can't answer this. me i will give brainlest and a 5-star rating) consider the speakers in "the raven" and the speaker in "the song of wandering aengus." write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the voice in these two poems. how does the poet give the speaker in each poem a distinctive voice? what effect does this voice have in each poem? use examples from each poem to as evidence for your answer

Can someone me with this english question