Language changes with time and context. what is your opinion about what constitutes good or bad usage? is it necessary for speakers or writers to follow a particular standard of correctness? do such standards vary with the audience and the situation? do you think an individual or a group of individuals can actually maintain a certain quality of language and usage? if your answer is yes, state how these rules can be applied effectively. if your answer is no, then state the reasons why such control should not be exercised. write a short essay to state your position on these questions. write your essay in the space provided.

Asap! : ( 20 points! cite textual evidence to support this analysis of the connection. a; he says that he chooses "to believe that there are insufficient finds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation," so it shows that he has given up hope. b; he states, "so we've come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches" of the nation for everyone. this proves that he wants government money to be equally shared. c; mlk explains that america should give african americans "a bad check, a check that has come back marked 'insufficient funds.'" d; he mentions that america wrote a bad check from freedom to african americans, but he states that he "refuses to belive that the bank of justice is bankrupt." he also states, "we've come to cash this or freedom and security of justice."

Can someone me with an english language arts assignment? i need someone who's an expert or good at english language ! i need correct answers only !

Which best compares the authors’ purposes in silent spring and “save the redwoods”? both authors want readers to protect human rights. both authors want readers to focus on saving trees. both authors intend to entertain readers with their essays. both authors intend to convince readers of their viewpoint.