Laura's paper argues that driver's education in schools
wastes public money. during peer evaluation, her friend
offers a counter-argument that driver's education is
valuable for students who need to drive to jobs.
is this counter-argument appropriate? why or why not?
a. no, because it is not defensible.
b. no, because it is neither defensible nor arguable.
c. no, because it is not arguable.
d. yes, it is both defensible and arguable.