subject
English, 26.08.2019 17:20 csarge2972

At first he went daily, then every other day and finally once a week, to the offices of the coal corporation where he used to be a miner, to find out what was what. the only thing he did find out in the end was that that little house of his was even a greater blessing than he had thought. some of his fellow ex-miners who had nowhere to return at the end of the day's waiting just slept outside the doors of the offices and cooked what meal they could scrounge together in bournvita tins. as the weeks lengthened and still nobody could say what was what jonathan discontinued his weekly visits altogether and faced his palm wine bar."
after reading the excerpt, student b writes this: "jonathan realizes how lucky he is when he observes some of the ex-miners eating from bournvita tins and sleeping outside the offices of the coal corporation."
which type of evidence describes the support in this student's response best?
inferred details
explicit details
textual evidence
personal connection

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:20
Adam posted in a thread about theoretical physics. in his post he refuted general relativity and cited a paper that was recently self-published by one person on her own personal website and had no references to other works in the field.which important question did adam not answer sufficiently when evaluating the cited paper?
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:30
What is the central theme of the sniper
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:00
The major difference between the communist party in china and political parties in the united states is that a. in the united states, political parties have no role in government. b. in china, the communist party shares power with the national people's congress. c. in the united states, political parties hold widely differing views on almost every topic. d. in china, the communist party runs the government with no opposition.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 13:10
Which is the best rebuttal to the following counter-argument? playing video games can be beneficial to youth because it enhances their hand and eye coordination, sharpens their reflexes, and keeps them out of trouble if they were playing outdoors. a. playing video games can be harmful because it is often done in isolation, which hinders the development of social skills b. playing video games can be harmful because excessive playing can lead to obsessive dependence, which can be dangerous. c. playing video games can be armful because it deprives kids of healthful exercise they would normally get by playing outdoors. d. playing video games can be harmful because the more attached youth are to the games, the more detached they become from reality.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
At first he went daily, then every other day and finally once a week, to the offices of the coal cor...
Questions
question
History, 10.03.2020 07:07