Read the excerpt from "tools of the spymaster." james jay's invisible ink did not become visible by heating. as he described it, his ink "would elude the generally known means of detection, and yet could be rendered visible by a suitable counterpart." jay's invisible ink consisted of two chemicals. an agent used one chemical to write an invisible message. to read the message, the reader had to brush a second chemical on the paper; that chemical made the message visible. the two-bottle system, supplied by jay, gave washington the secure form of writing that he wanted. which statement includes explicit information from the excerpt?
a. washington asked james jay to invent a form of invisible ink.
b. washington only knew about invisible ink that required heating.
c. james jay was a doctor who had knowledge of chemistry.
d. james jay created an invisible ink system that required two chemicals.'

D. James Jay created an invisible ink system that required two chemicals.

Explanation:

There are three sections with explicit information in the excerpt:

First part: The narrator indicates James's invisible ink was not visible even if heated. In other words, it was not detectable by any traditional means of detection.

Second part: This invisible ink required two chemicals, one to write the message and the other to reveal it. Here, the narrator explains the procedure to make it possible. (Here is where we find the answer to the question)

Third part: After Jay invented this system, he gave it to Washington who finally would be able to write as securely as he wanted.

D

Explanation:

owo

write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrators’ schools and explain how their schools shape their perspectives toward the hijab. cite evidence from the text to support your ideas.

copy and paste answer:

two paragraphs to compare and contrast the narrator's schools would be this, the one school with the veil is the one school were the students were forced to wear the veils, and they did not know why they had to wear the veils. the girl student writing the story was not like the other students, she didn't care. in the second school there was a lot of hostile activities going on throughout the school. most of the students were upset and this, including the author, but she was trying to look and the good side of things.  

overall, both schools had something that the students or most of the students did not like or appreciate. what you can learn from these stories is that life will never be exactly how you may want it to be. complaining about your lifestyle will only make matters worse or at least feel worse in the long run. that's happens to be the information you can interpret from these two stories.