Rachel teaches in the second grade and suspects that two students in her class have behavioral problems. although she works fervently to keep the class running smoothly, the students' behaviors continually disrupts the learning environment. when the two students blurt out the answers before being called upon, push others in line, or constantly get out of their seats, other students become distracted and irritated. according to which criterion will these students' behaviors might be considered abnormal?

Line 61-81: explain what opposing view king is addressing in this counter argument line 82-87: what is the effect of king mentioning his nobel prize?

What does the author see as the main cause for why students don’t really see shakespeare as a real, flawed human being? we shouldn’t shy away from discussing our literary heroes’ flaws. if nothing else, the knowledge of their failures us appreciate what success and greatness these authors did achieve. often our hero-worship keeps us from truly seeing the complexity of a great author. thus, i would argue, nothing would be better for high school students than to take shakespeare down a peg or two. a) the fact that students never learn enough about shakespeares biography b) the fact that students only read shakespeare’s comedies while in school c) the fact that students are never assigned to read any shakespeare while in high school d) the fact that students only read shakespeare’s greatest works in school and thus never see his weaknesses

If you receive an email then this doesn’t apply what does this mean?