Read the excerpt from levitt and dubner's freakonomics.
there is a tale, "the ring of gyges," that feldman sometimes tells his economist friends. it comes from plato's
republic. a student named glaucon offered the story in response to a lesson by socrates—who, like adam smith,
argued that people are generally good even without enforcement. glaucon, like feldman's economist friends,
disagreed. he told of a shepherd named gyges who stumbled upon a secret cavern with a corpse inside that wore
a ring. when gyges put on the ring, he found that it made him invisible. with no one able to monitor his behavior,
gyges proceeded to do woeful things-seduce the queen, murder the king, and so on. glaucon's story posed a
moral question: could any man resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed? glaucon
seemed to think the answer was no. but paul feldman sides with socrates and adam smith—for he knows the
answer, at least 87 percent of the time, is yes.
the example in the excerpt the authors arrive at which of the following conclusions?
the majority of people are corrupt.
o the majority of people are honest.
glaucon and paul feldman were wrong.
socrates and adam smith were wrong.

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.

answer: while there are loads of great interviewing techniques and questions, i feel it’s important to balance time and effectiveness when determining whether a candidate and employer relationship will be strong long-term.

explanation:

i think the answer is :   the assassination of julius caesar causes the death of numerous roman citizens, the formation of new conflicts, and mark antony rises in power, also b

hope i

-lavira : )

the answer to the given question above would the one that wiesel is establishing and how is ethos by appeal to his authority in having survived the holocaust. hope this answers your question.

have a great day ahead!