She tried to remember. no, i swear he never harmed me
but in that. he never harmed me but in that and what if
he did? there was the day, the day, but a whirl of dark
smoke rose and covered it, crept up and over into the
bright field where everything was planted so carefully in
orderly rows.
what is one purpose of the symbolism used in this passage?
o
a. to link two unlike concepts: a field and mountains
ob. to make a connection between granny and the reader
o
c. to illustrate the destruction of granny's dream
o
d. to compare granny to "a whirl of dark smoke"

i need more information about this article .

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.