Skateboarding is not a crime!

some adults really look down on kids who go skateboarding. they tend to think of these kids as gutter punks, or thugs, or some such thing. well, i have known many skateborders, and nothing can be further from the truth. skateboarders are typically very intelligent. they are also highly courteous. the skateboarders i know would never hurt anyone! in fact, we (yes, i said "we"; i'm a skateboarder myself) tend to have a more highly developed sense of morality than most kids our age. the negative scapegoating of skateboaders needs to stop.

how do these two essays differ in their focus?
a) they both defend people who go skateboarding, but the first essay is written in first person while the second essay is written in third person.
b) they both defend people who go skateboarding, but the first essay is written in third person while the second essay is written in first person.
c) they both defend people who go skateboarding, but the first essay focuses on how skateboarders undeservedly have a bad reputation, while the second essay focuses on how skateboarders shouldn't be prevented from skateboarding.
d) they both defend people who go skateboarding, but the first essay focuses on how skateboarders shouldn't be prevented from skateboarding, while the second essay focuses on how skateboarders undeservedly have a bad reputation.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

i would pick a. i think this is more of a personal question though.

the answer is b. the tomb is underground and dark, and its opening is covered by a heavy grate.

the answer is:

when will (v) the books (n) be (v) due?

nouns refer to people (other than pronouns), places and things, whereas verbs describe actions and are usually part of the predicate of a sentence. finally, pronouns can work as nouns and identify the participants in speech.

in the example sentence, "will" is a verb part or auxiliary verb, "be" is an infinitive verb and "books" is a plural noun.