5paragraphs 5 or more sentences each paragraph explain how evolution can be considered a fact a theory and a hypothesis

me i really need it you .

Many scientists believe in Evolution as the common answer to the origin of life. A huge percentage of scientists claim that Evolution is a fact. However, fail to put in doubt this widespread theory and fail to achieve to find proff about the credibility of this theory. How can one know that evolution is not a fact but instead a mere theory or even a myth? The many theories evolution has itself is very complex and oftentimes incomprehensible; it does not bring peace and sastisfactory answers to an individual looking for a purpose in life but instead leaves the person with doubt and many questions which seem to have no answer. The theory of evolution is an idea which can easily be debunked by any person with wits who knows that such a theory has many controversies and that in the end can lead to no final conclusions.

Evolution is no scientific fact but instead a philosophy. However, people believe it’s a fact because of fossil remains that seem similar to modern animals. For example: In the book (Science: Preparation for the Test) states: “Scientists compare animals living today with the fossilized remains of animals that no longer exist. By doing so, they can obtain [supporting ideas] of common ancestry.” And an example of ancestry observed by scientists is found on in the same book mentioned, where it says: “Scientists have found fossilized remains of a series of animals that are relatives of today’s whales...Pakicetus... the skull represents [similarity] between the ear of a land animal and an aquatic animal”. Now, such claims are pointless and overbearing. If we look at both creatures the pakicetus has no registered fossils of evolutionary signs which can give any proven fact of its evolutionary trip from land to the sea. The book entitled: “Life... How did it come to be” has logical insight to the imperfections found in the theory of Evolution. The book mentioned states: “Why are registered fossils so important in Evolution? Gene expert G.L Stebbins said: “No biologist has seen in reality the origin of evolution. None of the great organisms has made an evolutionary change.” Today, we see no organisms who evolve through evolution.” Even Charles Darwin admitted: “The distinctions characterized in specific forms of life and the fact that they are not connected between themselves... is very obvious “. Using common logic Evolution cannot be a direct fact. But, instead it must remain only as a mere theory and in the future a possible myth.

Almost all scientists which claim to follow Darwin’s evolutionary theories have failed to provide proff of its existence and left results to experiments inconclusive. The Magazine entitled: “The origin of life” states: “Biology professor Alexandre Meinesz said in 2008 that during the past 50 years “No proff has sustained the hypothesis of a spontaneous arrival of life on Earth by means of a molecular soup and no scientific knowledge pointed towards this direction”. There is a basic law in science and that is that life cannot emerge on its own, life always comes from a pre-existing life source. However, Evolution claims that life has come from material that was unresponsive and non-existent. How can such a thing even be possible if the basic law of science is that life produces life? The magazine “The origin of life” also states: “Life comes from life. Believing that a simple live cell came to be by a casualty using [un-living] material is an act of faith”.

Evolution can be considered a hypothesis and a theory but in no way can it be considered a straight up fact, no matter how logical or convincing most scientists make it seem. It is simply not a proven fact. Nature, animals, the performance of the human body, etc is absolutely perfect. That is why that something that seems perfect in every sense possible cannot be a work of casualties. The work “Evolution or Creation” states: “Evolution is an act of faith”. Just like religion is an act of faith believing that raw materials can turn to living things is also an act of faith. Unless Evolution had photographic and physical proff of its existence there is no possible way that it can be a teachable fact.

Whenever we want to practice or belief a certain idea, thought, etc. We must first consider who founded the belief or idea and why they founded it. We must later confirm for ourselves if it’s the truth and if not discard of it immediately. Charles Darwin is considered the first to have hypothesized a theory which contradicted all the religious beliefs of there ever being a Creator. Such a critical hypothesis came to him after the death of his beloved daughter. Looking for some religious consolation Darwin was left upset and frustrated by the religious clergy of his time who affirmed that God needed another angel in heaven; by saying this they directly affirmed that God was the direct cause of his child’s death...

Hope this helps, call out for me if you need anything else sweetie :D

formal arguments

in written, formal arguments, the best way to build credibility with readers is to provide them with evidence. no matter what your argument might be and which side you agree with, citing strong evidence to back up your claim leaves the opposition with little to argue.

emotional appeal is often used in oral arguments. written arguments, however, rely on four main types of evidence. as you read further, you will see that some types are more credible than others and "hold more water" so to speak.

statistical evidence

the strongest type of evidence in formal writing is statistical evidence. this ranges from true, hard data presented as a percentage or number, to survey-type data. for example, statistical evidence could be:

4 out of 5 experts claim

85% of women in the united

7 members were present

statistical evidence can be proven as fact. you can actually go out and find hard information to prove your particular claim.

testimonial evidence

the use of celebrities as credibility evidence can be considered testimonial in nature. many people look up to celebrities as role models in their lives. good or bad, when a person chooses a life-path that takes them into public light, there will be many others out there who want to emulate the celebrity. these celebrity endorsements provide the second-strongest type of evidence found in formal arguments.

testimonial evidence can also be collected from experts and authorities in a given field. doctors, dentists, lawyers often provide expert testimonials. their authority is not often questions. they are expected to "know their stuff."

anecdotal evidence

when storytelling is involved as evidence, anecdotal evidence is being used. due to its less objective nature, anecdotal evidence is not extremely strong. when coupled with statistical or testimonial evidence, anecdotal evidence can be highly effective in determining credibility or proof.

storytelling, although based on fact, can include quite a bit of opinion, thus making it less objective. usually, eyewitnesses are used as providers of anecdotal evidence. they saw or experienced the phenomenon at hand are telling their version or side of the story.

analogical evidence

when information is scarce about something and little is known, analogical evidence is often used in a formal argument to increase credibility of the proof. if the phenomenon in question is new and little is known about it, analogical evidence that pulls in known factors about a similar phenomenon to show parallels can be an effective way to provide proof.

due to limited knowledge about the phenomenon, in this situation, analogical evidence can be regarded as the weakest type of evidence used in formal arguments. one can only imagine and hope that the comparison-phenomenon is close enough that the results can be applied to the new phenomenon.

in the

all that really matters in a formal argument is whether or not the writer has credible evidence to back up what they want to say or what they are thinking. so often, we hear people say, "prove it! " to one another.

one last little formal arguments not only provide credible evidence to support claims, don't forget that acknowledgment of the opposing point of view in an argument also strengthens the entire product.