How should the syntax in this sentence be changed, if at all? the scientist spent years analyzing the results of numerous medical studies meant to identify the cause of the disease.

a) no change
b) the scientist spent years looking at the results of a variety of the different medical studies meant to located the cause of the disease.
c) the scientist spent years reviewing medical study results to find the cause of the disease.
d) the scientist spent years studying the results of many medical studies in order to uncover the cause of the disease.

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”

If the court issues an injunction against the school's rule, will the petitioning students be glad or upset?

What point was thomas paine trying to make by relating this antidote