50 points and brainliest doesn’t have to be 750 words

write an argumentative essay of at least 750 words in which you argue that other female writers of the time would agree or disagree with fuller's statement: "what woman needs is not as a woman to act or rule, but as a nature to grow, as an intellect to discern, as a soul to live freely, and unimpeded to unfold such powers as were given her when we left our common home."

In this lines, Fuller states that the need to grow is not a "woman" need but a "human" need. She states that humans needs that are similar to this one include the right to use their intellects, the need for the soul to be free and the liberty to use all abilities and skills they possess.

This was a view that would have been accepted by most feminist authors at the time. These authors would most likely have argued that women need these rights to grow and develop. However, authors who were not feminist would have disagreed with it, as they would have been more comfortable with more traditional gender roles.

its definitely second person : )

explanation: