Ineed .
title: the bystander effect dorothy barkin.

The answer to #13 is C because the studies show that people are more likely to intervene in physical, threatening conflicts rather than in a robbery.

The answer to #14 is D due to the fact that the killer repeatedly came back when he realized Kitty was still alone. He had originally retreated to his car when a witness shouted at him, and he fled the second time, but in both instances the murderer came back to finish her.

The answer to #15 is most likely B because the article states that bystanders are less likely to get involved when they're in a group (so A and D don't make sense) and it also says that people are less likely to get involved when the conflict occurs between family, specifically husband & wife (but this could also be father-son) so C is cancelled too.

The answer to #16 is C because the author informs the reader about the many different factors, but they also persuade the reader to take action at the end of the article.

The only one I'm not 100% sure about is 15, but I think it's right given the evidence. Hope this helps!

12. D. time order

13. C

14. D. kept attacking

15. B

16. C

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people

what are the choices?