Read the passage.

(1) while banning books is not a trendy topic these days, it is still important to acknowledge the outdated and threatening nature of this ongoing practice. (2) the banning of books should be made illegal, based on the rights protected by the first amendment. (3) if the practice of banning books continues, soon authorities will be banning every other form of media as well. (4) if the supreme court has found the banning of books in violation of the constitution, then who am i to argue?

which sentence in this passage contains a logical fallacy that should be removed?
sentence 1
sentence 2
sentence 3
sentence 4

(3) If the practice of banning books continues, soon authorities will be banning every other form of media as well.

This sentence contains a slippery slope. It is says that since the authorities are banning some books, they will eventually ban other forms of media as well. The speaker starts off with the subject of books, then slides into the topi of all other media. This logical fallacy weakens the argument because it makes the speaker seem unreliable. It also distracts the reader from the books which is the focus of the passage.

it's the third one

Explanation:

i would say the correct answer is not concrete.

comfortable

explanation:

one type of the adjectives is predicate adjective. a predicate adjective is an adjective which follows a linking verb and modifies or refers back to the main subject of that linking verb.

it usually is used just before the noun it modies.

here in this example:

'penguins seem comfortable in the coolest habitats', comfortable is the predicate adjective which follows the linking verb 'seem' and modifies the noun.