Mond says that sacrificing real feelings and emotional attachment is a piece of society has to pay for stability do you agree with him that this price is worth paying?

Mond is a character from the book Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley.

According to this character, for society to reach stability and, as a consequence, happiness, it is necessary to let go of passions and overpowering emotions.

The world described in this story is one in which people are not naturally born, but created. Those who are lucky to be created Alphas are the ones who perform intellectual tasks. Others, however, are created to be less intelligent so that they will enjoy performing other types of tasks.

Even though social stability is important, it should not come at the expense of individuality and free will. Society should be able to offer freedom for individuals to choose, to feel, to love and to live. Stability cannot be called happiness merely because it makes people satisfied, especially if such satisfaction means not knowing of other possibilities, other choices to be made.

Not being satisfied is, actually, what brings change and evolution. If that is taken away from people, they become fleshy robots who will take any input, who will buy what they're told, go where they're told, do what they're told. If satisfaction becomes a synonym for inertia, it means nothing at all.

hooch has about 3% alcohol content so the 5 gallon 90% platinum vodka would be stronger because it has a higher alcohol content then hooch.  

the hunger games, written by  suzanne collins, is fiction in the young adult genre, which is not my age group, but i found myself unable to put it down. its combination of nerve-racking tension, thrilling action, and engaging love story kept me up until the wee hours. i was surprised at how completely engrossing the plot was. like  brave new world, this story is set in a future where the government oppresses its people, but the book also borrows ideas from the greek myth of theseus and the minotaur.

divided into 12 districts, ruled by an oppressive government located at the  capitol. katniss everdeen, a 16-year-old girl from district 12, takes her younger sister’s place as one of 24 “tributes” selected every year to participate in the hunger games at the capitol.

while i found this book absolutely enthralling, i was surprised it was aimed at an audience of young adults. it seems extremely intense for anyone younger than 16 or 17. for example, there is a scene where one young tribute is slowly eaten alive by wolf-like creatures all night long, and katniss has to finally throw a weapon at him to end his misery. i found this a little too disturbing when i considered the age of the character.

the intensity of the action was something one would find in a more mature book, but the age of the characters and the simplicity of the prose were aimed at a much younger audience. in addition, this book was written in present tense, which i found annoying, but that’s more of a personal preference than a stylistic fault. it was also edited somewhat poorly, but that rarely distracted from the plot. for example, the author often spoke in sentence fragments to describe how katniss felt, which might have been an attempt to reflect on her thought process, but i found it disorienting to read a lot of really short sentences all together. it would have been better to vary the sentence length on occasion, but the story was still coherently.

overall,  the hunger games  was an excellent, enthralling read that i highly recommend. if it was more clearly marked for older teens, it would have been better, but it was a fantastic book with a wonderfully creative plot.

happy to .

pls mark as brainliest.