subject
English, 24.06.2019 09:00 Anthonyc123

Analysis of “the master of life” chief pontiac was born in 1720. his father was an ottawa and his mother was a chippewa. in 1755, he became chief of the ottawa nation. he also became a follower of a native american religious leader named neolin, who preached against the english colonists. he said that the native american spirits were angry with native americans for becoming dependent on english goods and adopting their customs. the french and indian war occurred a few years before the american revolution. pontiac supported the french in this war, which ended the french occupation of north america south of the canadian border. when the french and indians were defeated, pontiac carried on and waged a private war against the british colonists. in 1764, the british ended this rebellion once and for all. in 1769, pontiac was murdered by another native american from a different tribe, who was possibly paid by the british to kill him. pontiac’s speech begins like many others delivered by leaders who want to explain to their people why it’s necessary to go to war. leaders use their own words or phrases, but the reasoning is usually the same. pontiac gives his reasons: we’ve been victims of injustice. we’re being threatened by an enemy. the enemy isn’t as strong as it appears. we need to go to war now to defeat the enemy. you can find a similar logic in the declaration of independence. you can also find it in the speeches to the united states and to the united nations when us politicians urged war on iraq in 2003. but pontiac’s speech takes a very interesting turn. pontiac takes an ancient myth and uses it for his own purposes. his audience would have heard many myths about the wolf. here, pontiac takes the myth and rewrites it, so that it can be used to serve his own political ends. now read "yonder sky has wept tears of compassion on our fathers" by seath’tl (seattle). when you've finished reading the speech, return to this assignment, and read to speech analysis. reflect and respond now that you have read the speech, ask yourself these questions: 1. what elements in the speech sound as though they were probably part of the original myth? 2. how does pontiac make the myth relevant to the current situation he wants to remedy? read the speech again, underlining other metaphors and similes. in your journal or using your computer, write out your interpretation of each metaphor.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
How did hinojosa's mom's experience described in this story impact hinojosa's sense of who she is? 2. how is hinojosa's experience of the united states similar to your own? how is it different? 3. describe a time when you felt voiceless or powerless. what led you to feel that way? were you able to find your voice? why or why not?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
Article 1: article 2: valido accused of accepting bribes unpopular conservative senator raymond valido (r-louisiana) stands accused of accepting more than $1 million in campaign donations from the nosco oil company in exchange for his efforts to pass a bill. the bill would allow the company to build a massive oil pipeline that will span the entire east coast of the us. senate colleagues on both sides of the aisle are demanding valido release his campaign finance reports. “if valido did accept these contributions from nosco, he essentially accepted a bribe and is now fulfilling his part of the bargain,” said senator michelle saud (d-new hampshire). the federal election commission saw no evidence of unlawful conduct in valido’s fundraising. however, if the senator did accept contributions in return for legislative favors, he may be censured by the senate. what is the reporter’s motive in article 1? what is the reporter’s motive in article 2? which term from senator nelson’s quote in article 2 is an example of bias?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 13:00
Ineed it now in this discussion you will use what you learned about the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias" to compare how both dickinson and shelley used form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems. let's check out one of your classmate's posts: in both "will there really be a 'morning'? " and "i dwell in possibility," emily dickinson capitalizes the words in the poem that tell the reader what to focus on in the poem. shelley also capitalizes words that are not names. these must be important to the meaning of the poem. create one post that compares how both dickinson and shelley use form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias".
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 20:50
Which archetype best describe antigone? select two options. the sage the coward the tragic heroine the rebel the villain
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Analysis of “the master of life” chief pontiac was born in 1720. his father was an ottawa and his mo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
History, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
Biology, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 01:00
question
Biology, 03.12.2020 01:00