Which of the following is not an example of a fallacious reasoning? question 1 options: a) parallelism b) bandwagon c) generalization d) oversimplification

Your answer here is A.

Explanation:

Parallelism is a balance within sentences of similar phrases, which means that the sentence repeats words that are alike. For example, "She likes singing, reading, and dancing." or "She likes to sing, read, and dance."

Fallacious reasoning is an irrational argument, for instance, "All African Americans like rap music." this is a generalization of one specific race, and shouldn't be used as evidence to back up one's claim.

Hopefully this cleared some things up! :)

D. Oversimplification.

Explanation:

Oversimplification is not the example of fallacious reasoning. This is because it does not make use of any faulty reasonings or invalid concepts. It has no intention of manipulating with any deceptive measures. It is a sound method with fair dependence on the contexts of basing the arguments. It is not persuasive in common use and does not have unsubstantiated assertions. Thus, among the others, oversimplification does not qualify for the condition of becoming a fallacious reasoning.

it was surely an odd creature that one made up by reading the historians first and the poets afterwards a worm winged like an eagle; the spirit of life and elegance and charm,   in a kitchen chopping up suet. but these creatures, monst'r however entertaining to the imagination, hast no existence in fact. what one might doth to bringeth h'r to life wast to bethink poetically and prosaically at one and the same moment,   thus keeping in toucheth with fact—that the lady is mrs martin, ag'd thirty-six, did dress in blue, wearing a black coxcomb and brown shoeth; but not losing sight of fiction eith'r—that the lady is a vessel in which all s'rts of spirits and f'rces art coursing and flashing p'rpetually. the moment, howev'r, yond one tries this method with the elizabethan mistress, one brancheth of illumination fails; one is did hold up by the scarcity of facts.   one knoweth nothing detailed, nothing p'rfectly true and substantial about h'r.   hist'ry scarcely mentions h'r.   and i did turn to professeth'r trevelyan again to seeth what hist'ry meanteth to that gent.   i hath found by looking at his chapt'r headings yond t meanteth.

question

will give

you will find groups such as germans, acadians, irish/scots, french, spanish, anglo/americans, african americans, and native americans. you are looking for the contributions that each of these groups provided to the settlement of louisiana.