Urgent ! will give i have to write a 5 paragraph argumentataive essay draft about why we should not change the voting age. i already have the first 3 but i need with the last 2. but i can't use any websites for research, i can only use the 2 included for this assignment. first paragraph: many people believe 21 should be the allowed voting age because according to a washington post article on not lowering the voting age to 1, authors bruce western and vincent schiraldi pointed out that " the brain doesnt finnish developing until the mid 20s," that young adults "are more similar to adolescents than fully mature adults" and that they " are more susceptible to peer pressure and less future-oriented."second paragraph: despite the fact that teens 16+ can get their drivers license, doesn't mean they have somewhat decent judgment on who to vote for. sometimes people forget that who our house of representatives chooses to be our next president could have a bad effect on our state. when voting, every ones vote matters because it determines who our next president will be and how he or she will affect our state and world for the next 4 years or until impeachment. third paragraph: another article by damien medina with the san diego union tribune says, "at that point, the hype was that president obama was our first black president." " i know many of my classmates voted for president obama for the simple fact that he was black." this specific sentence caught my eye because it shows that teens sometimes dont think about the consequences or in this case other factors in voting for president obama. like damien medina mentioned in this article, " kids wanted to say they were part of history by re-electing our first black president." this means that most of his classmates most likely didnt look at other benefits and flaws in electing obama and focused on trying to be a part of america's history not thinking of possible consequences.

The arctic national wildlife refuge is home to caribou, moose, musk oxen, wolves, foxes, grizzlies, polar bears and migratory birds. leaders in the oil industry believe the refuge is the perfect site for the “environmentally sensitive exploration” of oil. environmentalists are wondering: what will become of the wildlife? president george w. bush, oil-industry leaders and others believe that americans will benefit from the oil that lies under the snow-filled surface of the refuge. in their opinion, the oil will reduce high fuel prices and decrease our need for oil from other countries. i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? americans are the largest consumers of oil. instead of drilling for oil, we should decrease our need for foreign oil simply by using less. we must all work together to cut back on the oil we use in order to preserve the wildlife of the arctic national wildlife refuge. what type of argument is used in this paragraph? i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? a. appeal to emotion c. appeal to logic b. bandwagon d. none of the above select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d