To say that something is "good" or "strong" is not a subjective, because these words can't be defined b objective, because the definitions of these words depend on feelings or judgments c subjective, because these words are indicators that the person who uses them is making a statement of quality d appropriate for the media and automatically makes a message invalid and not usable

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the correct answer is:   [d]:   " espionage " .

hope this is to you!

    best wishes in your academic endeavors —

          and within the community!