How are the two arguments made in the passages different hey the first passage claims that pets in class will children with health problems ii positive pets will make some health problems worse be the first passage claims that students nervousness will decrease around pets ii says the students nervousness will increase around pets

There are two main ideas for each passage, in the first one it mentions the positive outcomes of having a pet in class; it can help children with health problems and nervousness in students will decrease. In this sentences it supports the idea of a pet in class, saying the positive results of it and how it helps or it will help children.

In the second passage it mentions the negative outcomes of having a pet in class; they will make some health problems worst and the nervousness in students will increase around them. These two ideas are against the possibility of having a pet in class, mentioning how it will affect students instead of helping them.

What makes these two passages different is the opinion towards one main idea: pets in class. One passage supports it and one is against it.  

A. The first passage claims that pets in class will help children with health problems; the second passage says pets will make some health problems worse

Explanation:

hope this helped if this didn't im sorry. have a wonderful day :) :) :)

the answer is: the start of world war i, and russia’s hopes of benefiting from it

during world war i russian joined due to in their current crisis they were being supported by france and the war was already declared to them by germany, they needed to maintain their political goal and leadership role in the balkans, and is the same feeling that this excerpt evoke the eager of maintain the land value.

wallop

to hot or strike with a hand blow

explanation: