If a reporter receives an anonymous tip claiming that the sheriff is taking payouts from a local gang, what must the reporter ascertain. a. what proof the tipster is able to provide b. why the tipster wants to talk c. if the tipster is willing to be quoted by name d. whether the tipster is a supporter of the sheriff or a gang member

The correct answer is A. What proof the tipster is able to provide.

The reason why it's anonymous is probably because the person providing the information doesn't feel comfortable providing their identity. That's why we have so many tip lines that assure us we won't be asked for our names, information about where we live or even how we know what we know. All they care about is the information we provide and the accuracy of it.

Hence the correct answer can't be C or D. Just imagine what would happen to the tipster if they are quoted or exposed. They want the crime to stop but they don't want to be harmed for being the people talking about it.

In order to stop the crime or expose it, it is necessary for the reporter to have concrete evidence of it. Without proof, the reporter won't be able to check if the tip is true. His reputation is also undermined if what he publishes turns out to be fake, so proof is very important.

Answer B it's also incorrect because the intention of the tipster should be irrelevant. Also by stating why they want to talk, they'd be revealing who they are to the criminals (or at least give them an idea) and they wouldn't remain anonymous anymore.

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

answer: they were written as a long tale

explanation:

i googled it.