The tinker vs des moines supreme court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the vietnam war. the school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech. which best summarizes the majority opinion? a. there is no precedent for schools to limit the rights of students, so it is unconstitutional to suspend the students for their armbands. b. the case went through process of judicial review to determine that fear of disruption alone was reason enough to suspend the students. c. the first amendment protects the students' rights to wear the armbands ; they weren't disruptive, and the school allowed other students to wear controversial symbols. d. the second amendment guarantees citizens the right to bear arms and form a militia, so they were allowed to express their feelings about the war. i think the answer is c, but what do you guys think?

What would serve is strong evidence of universal theme of conflict between children and parents and amy tan’s story to canes

What is darrow’s main argument and the claims he makes in this excerpt? a. darrow argues that even if the boys are horrible monsters, their deaths will not solve the problems of society; he claims that society wants the boys to be executed because people enjoy watching public executions. b. he argues that the people who should be held responsible for the crime are leopold’s and loeb’s parents since they neglected their sons; he claims that leopold and loeb were jealous of the boy they killed because he had expensive belongings they could not afford. c. darrow argues that the boys should not face the death penalty; he claims they both suffer from mental illnesses that make them unable to tell the difference between a dream and reality. d. he argues that leopold and loeb, particularly dickie loeb, should not be executed; he claims they were teenagers who didn’t have proper adult guidance, so they are not responsible for what they did.

What if the author had used “looked at” instead? punishment would be deemphasized. punishments would be seen as less harsh. the meaning wouldn't change.