In part iii of the statute, jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he then declares that infringing on the principles in the statute would violate natural law. why might jefferson have mentioned the revocability of human law? what does he gain by doing this? what might he lose? answers should be at least 150 words.

perhaps, jefferson is the best spokesman that speak about american ideals of equality and liberty.

no one should be immune to the law because if there is an existence of someone that is above the law, a true equality would never be achieved

hope this

read more on -

no

hi! my name is angelica! i'll be assisting you today. i believe that the missing word is "questions" hope i !