Which statement best explains the relationship between william's "landscape with the fall of icarus" and of brueghel's painting of the same title? a. william's poem uses the painting to discuss a theme generally b. william's poem is a likeness of the painting c. william's poem compares the painting to other paintings d. william's poem provides a new interpretation of the painting

The statement that best explains the relationship between William's "Landscape with the fall of Icarus" and Brueghel's painting of the same title is: B.  William's poem is a likeness of the painting.  

The poet William Carlos Williams is basically describing Brueghel's painting.  Of course he does it from his perspective, focusing on the fact that it is spring and that Icarus's wings, made out of wax must have melted, making him fall to the sea, while nobody sees or pays attention to this event.  The painting describes this same situation, the poetic voice is also indifferent to the fall of Icarus, and the painting wants the viewer to feel this indifference.  

situational archetype describes the adventures of hero. the examples of situational archetypes are the quest, good vs evil, the task which represent respectively search, good forces, characters vs the evil ones and a certain job that must be done. from the given options, we cannot observe the subplot the beauty and the beast which is a correct answer for this question.

answer: i am not sure but i think you should go for c

explanation: