subject
English, 03.07.2019 16:30 graay0817

Read the passage from sugar changed the world. in 1733, parliament ruled that an extra six cents must be added to the price of every gallon of molasses that did not come from an english source. if the colonists actually followed the rules of the molasses act, it would have terrible consequences. molasses from french islands would now be too expensive—merchants could never make a profit. so they would have to turn to the english, who would surely raise their prices. this one law could cripple the entire north american trade with the sugar islands—if, that is, the colonists or the french followed the rules. but of course they did just the opposite. the molasses act accomplished nothing except to make americans better smugglers. yet the act was renewed again and again—until the crucial year of 1763. just as the molasses act was due to expire, england completed its victory over france in the global contest known as the seven years’ war (the segment of that war fought in north america is often called the french and indian war). to pay for the war, the prime minister decided to put some teeth into the legislation. now called the sugar act, the law was designed to make sure the american colonists stopped smuggling and paid their sugar tax. which details do the authors include to support the claim in this passage? select three options. an explanation of the results of the seven years’ war an explanation of how the molasses act benefited colonists an explanation of what was being taxed and how much it cost an explanation of why the americans smuggled molasses an explanation of why the british imposed the sugar act

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 15:00
Which of the following statements most closely reflects the author's description of the action taken by the united states supreme court in cases brought before them having to do with the japanese internment? a. "three years almost to the day, the supreme court decided that imprisoning japanese-americans was unconstitutional. " b. "the supreme court decided in favor of the japanese-americans in the very first case brought before them." c. "fred korematsu had plastic surgery and changed his name to avoid internment, making it the deciding case in the issue." d. "in april 1942 mitsue endo lost his habeus corpus case, thus postponing the supreme court's negative decision."
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
According to the study, a is when you string one quote after another in an essay without connecting them
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
In romeo and juliet who are romeos parents
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
Which ideas should he brianstorm about in order to write an effective essay select four options
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage from sugar changed the world. in 1733, parliament ruled that an extra six cents mus...
Questions
question
History, 26.06.2019 05:00
question
Mathematics, 26.06.2019 05:00