Read the passage from part 1 of “to build a fire.” possibly in its brain there was no sharp consciousness of a condition of very cold such as was in the man's brain. but the brute had its instinct. it experienced a vague but menacing apprehension that subdued it and made it slink along at the man's heels, and that made it question eagerly every unwonted movement of the man as if expecting him to go into camp or to seek shelter somewhere and build a fire. what does the dog’s behavior reveal about it? its knowledge of direction its ability to perform tricks its compassion for the man its intuition about nature

its intuition about nature

Explanation:

The dog felt that the cold was too hard and that protection or shelter from it had to be sought. The dog had the feeling  that the cold weather was a threat. This was the reason why the dog moved slowly along the man. Besides, the dog expected the man to do something against the harsh weather. It was attentive to any movement the man made since he expected him to find a solution.

i think it would be c. or a. i recommend a if it's not a than it's c if it's not c than it's b your welcome : ) sorry if you get it wrong

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.